Skip to content
Thursday, October 15, 2026
Modern Super Corner

Could Different Countries Emulate Australia's Lead in Restricting Social Media for Youth Under Sixteen?

Australia's controversial move to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of states are considering similar restrictions.

  • Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
  • The Norwegian government is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
  • Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options in reserve".
  • In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to approve a proposal lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
  • The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a good first step," commented the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing harmful online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and fit for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, legislation is largely occurring at the local level amid country-wide inaction.

  • The state of Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
  • Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
  • The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use dependent on a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from various figures to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are also taking action.

  • Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
  • Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies take a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international discussion unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that governments around the world are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.

JL
The writer

Jennifer Long

A tech enthusiast and freelance writer exploring the intersection of innovation and everyday life.

Modern Super Corner

Type to search articles.